Law Essay Example

Assignment ExamplesEssay Examples
Nov 6, 2019

The law student’s ability to argue is not confined to speech alone but must also be encapsulated in writing. Hence, knowing how to write a law essay is vital in a law student’s education. This becomes an essential skill in his future career as he engages in the writing of legal documents such as contracts and affidavits. To know how to write a law essay is to know the fundamentals of  how to write legal documents in general. The spirit of the law and the rigor behind its interpretation encompass an aspiring lawyer’s actions.

For a law freshman, however, learning how to write a law essay is difficult. Professors often do not give feedback on their students’ work. The law student is left to himself on discovering what went right and, usually, what went wrong. One of the most practical ways to learn is to read at an example of law essay. There, the law student will be able to learn what makes a law essay and what makes a great law essay. By looking at an example of law essay, he will also learn how to bolster his critical thinking and essay writing skills.

What follows from here is a law essay example, written meticulously to demonstrate what makes a great law essay. Notable here is how it shows that the law essay follows the typical argumentative essay layout while having its own nuances in legal studies. Hopefully, the law essay example below, which attempts to discuss the essence of constitutionality in the United States, will be a good model from which law students may learn how to write their own law essays.

Law Essay Example: Constitutionality in the United States

Constitutionality in the United States

     Constitutionality, in current times, pursues the welfare of its citizens. By definition, constitutionality is a categorical description that determines whether a law, regulation, or legislation is attuned to the present model of the Constitution. The United States today, with its current amendments and political climate, has demonstrated its advocacy towards a humane livelihood not only of its citizens but for its neighboring countries as well. A reading of history can show the legislative changes effected in the system of the United States which indicated its increasing emphasis on a universalized welfare. The same reading, however, also shows the roots of such a system, where constitutionality is far different than how it is understood today. In general, it signifies that constitutionality in the United States is defined by the social climate of the time and not inherently by a pursuit of the welfare and interests of all people.

    The legislation of the Bill of Rights in 1791 attempted to cement the rights and welfare of US citizens as an attempt to have an organized system under which the citizens’ liberty is backed by the State itself. While the efforts to formulate and implement it were collective, its inclusivity could not otherwise be considered as such. Racial slavery and segregation were the norms of 18th century then and had persisted for two centuries since. The Bill of Rights was designed to protect the freedom and rights to life, liberty, and privacy of people. Yet, the social climate at the time had a jarringly specific definition of “people,” one that is clearly racialized and biased against people of color. Consequently, the Bill of Rights was interpreted to not recognize Blacks. Rather, it was ratified to empower the already powerful Whites. Such interpretation was said to bear constitutionality. In today’s standards, this claim would be abhorred. The 13th Amendment, where “slavery and involuntary servitude” were abolished, is an indication of this. The Bill of Rights, by itself, was insufficient to protect the liberty of Blacks. The 13th Amendment had to be legislated to do so.

     The notion of constitutionality comes to the limelight upon the consideration of the Jim Crow laws. Racial slavery and segregation, taken as unconstitutional today, was, in each and every way, considered constitutional during the Reconstruction era. Prior to these laws, racism had already been widespread. Perceived as a commodity—and, worse, not human—Blacks were subject to abuse and prejudice. The Jim Crow laws served to institutionalize, and consequently bestow constitutionality, such abuse and prejudice. Laws such as these profoundly signify the fluctuating definition of constitutionality. What is “constitutionality”? Who is it for? A binding force  as it is, constitutionality is a continuously changing product of its time. Its conception today is different from its conception before.

    What some might raise against the present discussion is that the constitutionality before was archaic. The historical changes in legislation were an indication of progression. Racism, as well as sexism, are both immoral. Once their ethical value had been evaluated, they were slowly abolished, first in society then finally in constitutionality. Today’s Amendments are evidence of that. While it is to be conceded that there was, indeed, a moral progression, what must be pointed out in the above argument is that it presupposes that constitutionality is equated to morality. This cannot be the case. Racism and sexism were institutionalized because they were thought to be moral and proper. It was this, in large part, that they were considered constitutional. The conception of morality can progress; constitutionality only experiences shifts. More importantly, constitutionality is not equal to morality.

     This essay concludes by reiterating the original thesis statement. Constitutionality is defined by the social climate of current times. It is not modeled to be in a pursuit of welfare, nor is it an attempt to institutionalize morality, as opponents would proclaim. Instead, it is fluctuating based on the current dominant structure. There exists no progression with constitutionality; there are only shifts, which may be for the better or worse.

Law essay writing service for law students

Hopefully, law students will be able to learn a thing or two from the law essay example above. Writing a law essay requires knowledge and skills in various aspects. While reading an example of law essay can help, knowing how to write a law essay takes time and actual experience. Unfortunately, because of the hectic life typical of law education, as well as other commitments, some law students find it excruciatingly difficult to comply with their law essay requirements. This does not mean that they must lose hope, however. We at CustomEssayMeister deeply empathize with law students and salute them for their bold pursuit of a career in law. What lies ahead of them is immense difficulty, one which we are highly equipped and more than willing to help them in. Should a law student find himself unable to cope with his law essay requirements, he would find that asking for academic help from us will be one of the best decisions that he will ever make. We have a roster of seasoned writers, some of whom are specialized in writing law essays. Whether be it a custom essay, custom research paper, or custom term paper, we are always ready to help the law student in need. Are you a law student who needs some aid in your writing requirements? What you need is an essay writing service. Enlist our aid and enjoy law school like you never thought you could!

Let’s get your assignment done!

place an order