I believe that animal testing is necessary. Some animals may suffer for the

benifit of humans. if you prevent animal testing, should you stop people from

eating meat? Many scientists say that they can't cure deadly diseases without

using animals. I believe that animal testing is very necessary because it is

unethical to make people sick on purpose. Most experiments can only be

done on animals. As a result of animal testing we have discovered diseases. If

you prevent animals from being tested, should you stop people from eating

meat? Killing an animal for food isn't that different from killing an animal while

testing a new product or medicine. Animal testing could be considered more

necessary than killing an animal for food. People enjoy the animal "products"

that they consume daily. Many scientists say that humans can't cure deadly

diseases without using animals. Without animal testing scientists believe that it

may take longer to find cures for diseas like aids, cancer and alzheimer's.

Causing unnecessary suffering is wrong, but conducting experiments on

animals is necessary for human health. The testing that scientists perform on

animals can save human lives Animal rights activists' claim that test tube

experiments,computer simulations and other methods are alternatives to

testing medicines and other products on animals. Many of these techniques

are valuable, and are used by scientists on a regular basis. The problems are

that they don't tell us everything we need to know. Mixing human cells with a

new drug in a test tube doesn't show how the drug will affect an entire human

body. Animals are far too complicated for computers to simulate perfectly.

Animal testing is a very important step in improving human health.

Word Count: 282

Related Essays on Animal Testing