Essay, Research Paper: The Role Of Fate In Romeo And Juliet
Shakespeare
Free Shakespeare essays posted on this site were donated by users and are provided for informational use only. The free essay on this page was not written by our writers and should not be viewed as a sample of our writing service. We are neither affiliated with the author of this essay nor responsible for its content. If you need high quality, fresh and competent research / writing done on the subject of Shakespeare, use the professional writing service offered by our company.
In the play Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare, fate is the a
dominant factor throughout the story, and it is the cause of many hazardous
events, but Romeo and Juliet were ultimately the ones responsible for their
own deaths. The word fate generates a bit of confusion, and can have many
different connotations. Fate is an inevitable and often adverse outcome or
condition; destiny. The destinies of these two 'star crossed lovers' were
not set from the start of the story, but almost all events that took place
brought Romeo and Juliet closer to their inevitable fates. There were too
many coincidences to give the reader any doubt that the two protagonists
were entirely the masters of their futures.
The first coincidence was that Romeo and Juliet, the two lovers,
shared the
unfortunate fate that they were from feuding families. The two of them
were a perfect
match, and were completely in love with each other, and the odds that one
was a
Montegue and one was a Capulet are incredibly slim. They both showed their
grief when
they learned that the other was from the opposite family. "O dear account!
my life is my
foe's debt." (A-1:Sc5:ln 132), and "My only love sprung from my only hate."
(A-1:Sc5:ln
152) were the two expressions that Romeo and Juliet exclaimed,
respectively. Juliet had
the right idea when she showed her frustration with the feud, and its
influence on R&J's
relationship, in her solliloquy on the balcony, and said, "What's in a
name? That which we
call a rose, by any other word would smell as sweet..." (A-2:Sc2:ln 41-52)
Besides the fact that they probably would have never been able to
live a peaceful
life, none of the tragedies would have occurred had they not met in the
first place. This
scene, where the Montegues find out about the play is another twist of
fate. The servant
of Capulet, who happens to be illiterate, was given the job of telling
people about the
party, but only those specifically on a list written up by his master.
Since he could not
read, he was forced to ask two strangers to explain it to him. Those two
people could
have been anyone, but they just happened to be Romeo and Benvolio. Another
ironic fact
is that Romeo went to the party because he was madly in love with Rosaline.
Hypothetically, if Rosaline had been there, and she returned Romeo's love,
then all the
following suffering would have never occurred. Romeo was completely in
love with
another woman going to the party, and only found out about it in the first
place, through
an adverse twist of luck.
Although Romeo and Juliet were responsible for their own physical
deaths, but
fate played a big role in getting the two into a suicidal mindset. The
first and most
obvious example was the quarentine in Mantua. Friar Laurence's plan was
that Juliet
would be laid in the tomb, appearing to be dead, and when she woke up,
Romeo would be
there to meet her. The Friar was to send a message to Mantua, where Romeo
was
bannished to, and inform the anxious boy about the sceme. This is a
seemingly perfect
plan, and gives the readers a sense of hope, but it is squashed when the
they discover that
there was a quarrantine in Mantua, and Romeo was unable to get the letter.
and,even
right to the very end, fate was still rearing it's ugly head because if
Juliet had woken up
seconds learlier, .
Body Paragraph 4
Although R&J were illfatefully put in their awkward positions, it was their
falts that they
died. There were infinite instances where if a tiny detail had taken
place, these two
wouldn't have ended up like they did.
Conclusion
William Shakespear had countless times where he could have saved
both of them, but he does not. He gives the reader a little hope that the
two will survive, but with each event, that hope is squashed. Although
Romeo and Juliet did not have to kill themselves, none of the the tragedies
would have occurred, had it not been 'written in the stars'. Truly fate is
the most dominant force in the play, and is most responsible for the deaths
of Romeo and Juliet. Reverse deus ex machina
dominant factor throughout the story, and it is the cause of many hazardous
events, but Romeo and Juliet were ultimately the ones responsible for their
own deaths. The word fate generates a bit of confusion, and can have many
different connotations. Fate is an inevitable and often adverse outcome or
condition; destiny. The destinies of these two 'star crossed lovers' were
not set from the start of the story, but almost all events that took place
brought Romeo and Juliet closer to their inevitable fates. There were too
many coincidences to give the reader any doubt that the two protagonists
were entirely the masters of their futures.
The first coincidence was that Romeo and Juliet, the two lovers,
shared the
unfortunate fate that they were from feuding families. The two of them
were a perfect
match, and were completely in love with each other, and the odds that one
was a
Montegue and one was a Capulet are incredibly slim. They both showed their
grief when
they learned that the other was from the opposite family. "O dear account!
my life is my
foe's debt." (A-1:Sc5:ln 132), and "My only love sprung from my only hate."
(A-1:Sc5:ln
152) were the two expressions that Romeo and Juliet exclaimed,
respectively. Juliet had
the right idea when she showed her frustration with the feud, and its
influence on R&J's
relationship, in her solliloquy on the balcony, and said, "What's in a
name? That which we
call a rose, by any other word would smell as sweet..." (A-2:Sc2:ln 41-52)
Besides the fact that they probably would have never been able to
live a peaceful
life, none of the tragedies would have occurred had they not met in the
first place. This
scene, where the Montegues find out about the play is another twist of
fate. The servant
of Capulet, who happens to be illiterate, was given the job of telling
people about the
party, but only those specifically on a list written up by his master.
Since he could not
read, he was forced to ask two strangers to explain it to him. Those two
people could
have been anyone, but they just happened to be Romeo and Benvolio. Another
ironic fact
is that Romeo went to the party because he was madly in love with Rosaline.
Hypothetically, if Rosaline had been there, and she returned Romeo's love,
then all the
following suffering would have never occurred. Romeo was completely in
love with
another woman going to the party, and only found out about it in the first
place, through
an adverse twist of luck.
Although Romeo and Juliet were responsible for their own physical
deaths, but
fate played a big role in getting the two into a suicidal mindset. The
first and most
obvious example was the quarentine in Mantua. Friar Laurence's plan was
that Juliet
would be laid in the tomb, appearing to be dead, and when she woke up,
Romeo would be
there to meet her. The Friar was to send a message to Mantua, where Romeo
was
bannished to, and inform the anxious boy about the sceme. This is a
seemingly perfect
plan, and gives the readers a sense of hope, but it is squashed when the
they discover that
there was a quarrantine in Mantua, and Romeo was unable to get the letter.
and,even
right to the very end, fate was still rearing it's ugly head because if
Juliet had woken up
seconds learlier, .
Body Paragraph 4
Although R&J were illfatefully put in their awkward positions, it was their
falts that they
died. There were infinite instances where if a tiny detail had taken
place, these two
wouldn't have ended up like they did.
Conclusion
William Shakespear had countless times where he could have saved
both of them, but he does not. He gives the reader a little hope that the
two will survive, but with each event, that hope is squashed. Although
Romeo and Juliet did not have to kill themselves, none of the the tragedies
would have occurred, had it not been 'written in the stars'. Truly fate is
the most dominant force in the play, and is most responsible for the deaths
of Romeo and Juliet. Reverse deus ex machina
5
3
GOOD or BAD? How would you rate this essay?
Help other users to find the good and worthy free term papers and trash the bad ones.
Help other users to find the good and worthy free term papers and trash the bad ones.
Need a Custom Written Essay on Shakespeare: The Role Of Fate In Romeo And Juliet
Free papers will not meet the guidelines of your specific project. If you need a custom essay on Shakespeare: The Role Of Fate In Romeo And Juliet, we can write you a high quality authentic essay. While free essays can be traced by Turnitin (plagiarism detection program), our custom written papers will pass any plagiarism test, guaranteed. Our writing service will save you time and grade.
Related essays:
2
3
Shakespeare / The Tempest: Allegorical To The Bible?
Shakespeare's "The Tempest": Allegorical to the Bible
The Tempest is not a pure fantasy tale, but a purposeful allegory. The characters in the play are all representative of characters found in the ...
0
0
Shakespeare / Shakespeare And His Theater
Compared to the technical theaters of today, the London
public theaters in the time of Queen Elizabeth I seem to be
terribly limited. The plays had to be performed during daylight
hours only and...
3
13
Shakespeare / Iago's Exploits Of Cassio And Othello
A tragic fault is a character trait which causes the action of a tragic hero or
character. Iago manipulates Othello and Cassio by using their character traits and flaws
against them. It will become...
1
3
Shakespeare / Hamlet
HAMLET
It seems that it is human nature to want to please others, but compromising ones values in order to do so can result in people getting hurt emotionally or physically. In William Shakespear...
4
4
Shakespeare / King Lear: Loyalty
"Goodness" in King Lear: A Lesson in Loyalty
Shakespear's good characters, in the play King Lear, are considered good because they are loyal even when they are disguised from or unrecognizable b...

