Essay, Research Paper: Censorship In School
Censorship
Free Censorship essays posted on this site were donated by users and are provided for informational use only. The free essay on this page was not written by our writers and should not be viewed as a sample of our writing service. We are neither affiliated with the author of this essay nor responsible for its content. If you need high quality, fresh and competent research / writing done on the subject of Censorship, use the professional writing service offered by our company.
Censorship In School Is Not Right
6 pages in length. To be told what is permissible reading material and what is not
is a direct violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution. Yet all across the
country, school library shelves are being stripped of books that certain individuals
and groups deem as unacceptable. Censorship is alive and well in the United
States; its ripple effect on America's students is often as damaging as reading
one of many so-called controversial books. The writer reveals why censorship in
today's schools is both a violation of First Amendment rights, as well as a ploy
for radicals and liberals alike to control the minds of our children.
similarly,
censorship has to do with forbidding people to express themselves in the manner
best suited to their needs.
The aim of censorship is to restrict thought--that is, to prevent people from thinking "bad" thoughts.
The censors' basic premise is: Some ideas are so dangerous they must be suppressed. Material
is censored because, "it might give people ideas"--ideas that the censors wish to eradicate. Some
censors believe that "bad" thoughts cause direct harm to the person who entertains them. Some
Christians, for example, consider "impure" thoughts mortal sins that doom a soul to suffer in Hell for
eternity. Others simply hold that bad thoughts "corrupt" the thinker. For many years, this direct-harm
argument was used to suppress sexual material. According to the Hicklin doctrine, formulated in
England in 1868, the state had the right to suppress obscene material, which had a "tendency" to
"deprave and corrupt those whose minds are open to such immoral influences."
Our
ability to think is what makes us human, and our freedom of thought must be preserved at all costs.
And freedom of thought is not the freedom to think "good" thoughts. The distinction between fantasy
and reality is ignored or dismissed by the censors. This is why art is so feared by those at the
extremes of both the right and the left. But in the realm of the imagination, anything goes. In one's
own mind, one may do heinous things. One may rape, torture, steal, and murder. Fantasy is not
reality and does not become reality by magic. Fantasy becomes real only by an act of will and
anyone who commits that act of will is responsible for the consequences.
Freedom of thought is meaningless without the freedom to communicate one's thoughts to others.
Thus if freedom of thought is an absolute right, it would seem to follow that freedom of speech must
also be absolute. But speech is a transaction between two (or more) parties: one conveying
information and one or more receiving. All parties have the equal right to freedom of thought, and
freedom of thought entails the right not to hear, not to read, not to view, etc. In other words, by the
principle of equality, no one has the unlimited right to impose unwanted speech upon another.
Finally, the distinction must always be recognized between freedom of speech and freedom of
action. That is, adding a speech element to a criminal act cannot legitimize it. Catharine MacKinnon
has argued that speech is just another form of action and that if the state may regulate action it may
regulate speech. But speech differs from all other forms of action in that it conveys information and is
therefore privileged.
non to Pat Robertson--reject the principle of
equality. They believe that a certain segment of society, by virtue of its moral superiority, should have
the power and privilege of controlling access to information for society as a whole. Free-speech
advocates, on the other hand, believe that people should decide for themselves which books to read,
which movies to view, which images to observe, and what recordings to listen to. MacKinnon
cleverly argues the contrary--that equality dictates censorship to curb abuses by the powerful. What
she doesn't acknowledge is that whenever a censorship mechanism is established it is always used by
the powerful to silence the powerless and not the other way around.
Bibliography
None
Word Count: 675
0
0
GOOD or BAD? How would you rate this essay?
Help other users to find the good and worthy free term papers and trash the bad ones.
Help other users to find the good and worthy free term papers and trash the bad ones.
Need a Custom Written Essay on Censorship: Censorship In School
Free papers will not meet the guidelines of your specific project. If you need a custom essay on Censorship: Censorship In School , we can write you a high quality authentic essay. While free essays can be traced by Turnitin (plagiarism detection program), our custom written papers will pass any plagiarism test, guaranteed. Our writing service will save you time and grade.
Related essays:
0
0
Censorship / Music Censorship
Dave Root
English Composition
Essay #3
10.18.00
Censor This
Why is it that when a person that listens to music that may promote violence and contains “objectionable” lyrics does a bad ...
0
0
Censorship / Censorship Necessary Or Not?
In Plato’s Republic, he tries to develop a utopia for mankind. He utilizes conversation amongst people within in his book as a vehicle for larger and more serious topics to be discussed...
0
0
Censorship /
Seatbelts
Censorship in Society
If our society decides to have censorship, we compromise our freedom of speech and are left with the chore of deciding where to draw the illusive and unstable line between wha...
0
0
Censorship / Internet Censorship
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the peopl...
1
0
Censorship / Censorship In Society
If our society decides to have censorship, we compromise our freedom of speech and are left with the chore of deciding where to draw the illusive and unstable line between what should be ce...
1-866-308-7123, 1-404-963-0617 (fax)
1-877-294-0273, 1-614-921-2450, 0871-871-8283 (Billing, US & Canada)
1785 O'Brien Road, Columbus, Ohio, 43228, U.S.A.